Wading Through the Data Swamp:
Program Evaluation 201

Module 4: Correlation - Page 5 of 16

New Information: Change Scores and Participation

I told Jack that he should have his evaluator look into whether there was a relationship between the amount of services received and the amount of change in alcohol scores. Before we look at the new information, let's talk a little about change scores and the participation scale the evaluator used.

Change Scores

Change scores may seem a bit confusing, but the concept is fairly basic. We look at the difference between the posttest scores and the pretest scores for the participants' alcohol use. To calculate a change score, we subtract the pretest score from the posttest score for each participant.

Positive values denote an increase in alcohol use scores from pretest to posttest. Negative values denote a decrease in alcohol use. A zero value indicates that alcohol use remained unchanged.

Here is an example of a change score calculation:

  1. Posttest score - Pretest score = change
  2. 0 days uses - 4 days uses = -4 (change score)

This would be an ideal outcome. The participant's change score is negative, meaning this kid drank much less after the program than he did before.

Participation Scale

The evaluator coded attendance per participant based on the following 5-point scale:

1=1-36 days
2=37-72 days
3=73-108 days
4=109-144 days
5=145-180 days

For example, if a participant attended 108 days (3 times a week), he or she would be coded as a 3. If a participant attended all the sessions, he or she would be coded as a 5.

The next step is to look at change scores and attendance. For example, one participant had a change score of -2 and an attendance score of 3. Another had a change score of 3 and an attendance score of 0. Looking at change scores and attendance will help us answer the question:

Is there a relationship between services received during the Cool After School Program and the change in alcohol use?

fyi Your change scores may not always turn out the way you would like. Ideally, you would like to see less use after the program than before it. That's what the program is for. But sometimes, a phenomenon known as test reactivity may occur.

Test reactivity means that kids report lower drug use on their pretest surveys because they do not feel comfortable telling the truth. At posttest, the kids report higher use. This can happen because the kids are much more comfortable with the process and they know that their surveys are confidential.

How can you prevent test reactivity? Here are some tips:

Despite these steps, sometimes you just can't prevent test reactivity. This is one of the many reasons that it is so important to use a comparison group. If you are comparing the change scores of your participants to the change scores of the comparison group, it may not matter if test reactivity occurs. Of course that's if you have chosen an appropriate comparison group, one that is similar to your participant group and equivalent at pretest. In this case if one group experienced test reactivity, it is likely that the other did as well. In addition, we are comparing our participant group to the comparison group, we are not necessarily concerned with pretest and posttest scores. Instead, we are looking at the bigger picture. Which group did better overall? Which group had the greatest decrease in drug use from pretest to posttest?

Change Scores, Alcohol Use
Alcohol Icon

Picture of a scroll Scrolling Table! You can use the table below to scroll through the data.

Kid # Pretest Posttest Change in Alcohol Use
(Post - Pre)
Attendance Scale
(0-5)
1 2 0 -2 3
2 1 1 0 2
3 2 2 0 1
4 2 4 2 0
5 2 2 0 1
6 1 0 -1 4
7 2 2 0 2
8 0 0 0 1
9 4 5 1 0
10 1 0 -1 4
11 2 2 0 1
12 2 2 0 1
13 2 5 3 0
14 1 0 -1 3
15 2 3 1 0
16 1 0 -1 1
17 2 2 0 2
18 5 7 2 0
19 1 1 0 0
20 2 0 -2 4
21 2 2 0 1
22 2 6 4 0
23 0 0 0 1
24 2 1 -1 4
25 1 1 0 1
26 2 2 0 2
27 2 2 0 1
28 1 1 0 0
29 2 2 0 1
30 2 0 -2 2
31 0 3 3 0
32 2 0 -2 4
33 1 0 -1 5
34 0 0 0 3
35 2 2 0 0
36 2 2 0 1
37 1 0 -1 4
38 2 3 1 0
39 1 7 6 0
40 2 0 -2 2
41 0 0 0 3
42 2 2 0 1
43 2 5 3 0
44 1 3 2 1
45 2 0 -2 0
46 2 0 -2 2
47 2 3 1 0
48 1 0 -1 1
49 2 0 -2 5
50 2 2 0 0
 
   

Let's start by plotting the data.